Twitter’s starting to get my goat

Twitter has let users down yet again.

Steve Jobs is presently delivering his keynote speech at the MacWorld Conference. This is an extremely significant event for industry players. Most cannot make the conference and are forced to locate alternative means of following the news. Streaming video and live blogging, such as what Duncan Riley is doing at TechCrunch, provide a couple of options; however many are turning to Twitter because it’s arguably the fastest and most interactive of the lot.

In that sense Twitter has really begun to play a central role in significant events these days – not just for information consumers, but for deliverers as well. It provides an opportunity for staff working on major events to follow consumer/public opinion as it’s being formulated in the minds of the public. As such it provides some amazing insight.

This proved the case at the recent Iowa Caucus; some went so far as to say it even influenced the outcome. This may be just speculation though. (Will provide reference if I can find one).

However as of right now however, Twitter is unresponsive and no – or minimal – tweets are getting through. This has effectively crippled one of the key real-time modes of information dissemination and discussion and left countless users in the lurch.

The fact that Twitter continues to crash during times like this arises from nothing short of poor planning on the part of the company. Load and capacity planning is a fundamental consideration for providers of enterprise level services and the fact Twitter is not doing that is not only cause for a tremendous amount of frustration from end-users, but also concern about the staying power and future of the company.

Despite seeing a huge amount of discontent from users immediately following sudden unnannounced outages like the current one, users seem to flock back to Twitter with open arms once everything is fixed. I find this incredibly surprising in some ways. Yet due to the fact no other application has emerged to threaten Twitter’s position means there is no clear substitute. To a large degree this means user’s have no choice.

Jaiku for example, which was heralded as a Twitter killer, is looking as if it’s been left to die on the vine in the post-Google acquisition.

Pownce as well, despite all the initial hype, has not received the ongoing usage that was predicted.

So for the moment Twitter seems to still hold all the cards. Yet in the realm of constant ongoing innovation that is the web today, it’s only a matter of time before the next great thing comes along. And when this happens, if Twitter hasn’t gotten its act together I suspect we’ll see a mass exodus of unhappy users who have finally gotten sick of the unreliability of the tool and given up completely.

  • RJ
    Maybe you can build a substitute.


    Or you can just complain and wait for someone else to do it - and have them get all the money ;)
  • Lion
    From Crunchbase:
    Twitter funding

    July 07 2007

    Series B

    $5.40M



    Charles River Ventures

    Union Square Ventures

    Marc Andreessen

    Dick Costolo

    Naval Ravikant

    Ron Conway
  • Mike Bogle
    @RJ - Building a start-up when applications like Twitter are already dominating the space would be a very risky venture.


    Besides my complaint isn't about the app itself - I quite like Twitter in that respect - but rather the holes in their maintenance and management of acceptable service levels.



    From a service delivery standpoint this is where the importance of users voicing their complaints lay. It gives Twitter a more accurate picture of user satisfaction levels.



    Users will only put up with outages like this for so long before they leave the application for greener pastures. Twitter is better off having access to these complaints - as hard as they may be to listen to sometimes - as it gives them a clear picture of the areas that are bothering users the most and therefore helps influence decisions of resource allocation.



    If users don't say anything the exodus may come out of the blue from service provider's perspective as public opinion would have been relatively silent on the subject.
  • RJ
    Good point
  • gregory
    bandwidth and server capacity/maintenance seem to be limits that no one talks about in the popular tech press


    i think it is going to be like driving on the freeways pretty soon, look at all the cool cars, going nowhere for hours



    the economist is the only publication i have seen address this, the industry doesn't want to hear it, i think
blog comments powered by Disqus