<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Openness as culture, not courseware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techticker.net/2009/09/04/openness-as-culture-not-courseware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techticker.net/2009/09/04/openness-as-culture-not-courseware/</link>
	<description>educational technology, eLearning &#38; emerging technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:23:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Jones</title>
		<link>http://techticker.net/2009/09/04/openness-as-culture-not-courseware/comment-page-1/#comment-5906</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techticker.net/?p=2797#comment-5906</guid>
		<description>Agree 100%.

Increasingly seeing OER, related concepts and many other non-related concepts (e.g. open source LMS) as simply a series of fads that someone has thought was a good idea and convinced an organisation to adopt.  The organisation does something, but is never embedded, never core and consequently when the problems overwhelm the benefits of &quot;having the fad&quot; the fad dies.

Changing conceptions and practices of the people and the system is necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree 100%.</p>
<p>Increasingly seeing OER, related concepts and many other non-related concepts (e.g. open source LMS) as simply a series of fads that someone has thought was a good idea and convinced an organisation to adopt.  The organisation does something, but is never embedded, never core and consequently when the problems overwhelm the benefits of &#8220;having the fad&#8221; the fad dies.</p>
<p>Changing conceptions and practices of the people and the system is necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Assumptions, Challenges and Opening Up &#124; TechTicker</title>
		<link>http://techticker.net/2009/09/04/openness-as-culture-not-courseware/comment-page-1/#comment-5810</link>
		<dc:creator>Assumptions, Challenges and Opening Up &#124; TechTicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 01:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techticker.net/?p=2797#comment-5810</guid>
		<description>[...] last few posts (Part One, Part Two, and Part Three) have devoted considerable attention to outlining what I see as a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last few posts (Part One, Part Two, and Part Three) have devoted considerable attention to outlining what I see as a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Distributed Models of Sharing &#124; TechTicker</title>
		<link>http://techticker.net/2009/09/04/openness-as-culture-not-courseware/comment-page-1/#comment-5807</link>
		<dc:creator>Distributed Models of Sharing &#124; TechTicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 23:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techticker.net/?p=2797#comment-5807</guid>
		<description>[...] on my last post about open culture versus open content, I wanted to expand a bit on the topic of the distributed system of sharing that I mentioned.  I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on my last post about open culture versus open content, I wanted to expand a bit on the topic of the distributed system of sharing that I mentioned.  I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
