<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu Live 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techticker.net/2008/05/08/ubuntu-live-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techticker.net/2008/05/08/ubuntu-live-2008/</link>
	<description>educational technology, eLearning &#38; emerging technology</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Bogle</title>
		<link>http://techticker.net/2008/05/08/ubuntu-live-2008/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Bogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 04:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mbogle.wordpress.com/?p=1610#comment-121</guid>
		<description>I'll be interested in hearing whether you end up using one OS more than the others.  In terms of VMware, in my case I use the host machine (Mac OS 10.5) far more than any of the virtual machines (Ubuntu and XP); and on my dual-booting systems I use Ubuntu more than XP.

Now having used both virtual and parallel booting systems, I think my inclination is for parallel ones.  Especially in the case of the ones on my Mac, the situation with conflicting shortcuts gets seriously confusing after a while.  Plus I like being able to take full advantage of the system resources rather than adding the extra bloat of running two operating systems at one time.  But that's just me :)

Cheers,

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be interested in hearing whether you end up using one OS more than the others.  In terms of VMware, in my case I use the host machine (Mac OS 10.5) far more than any of the virtual machines (Ubuntu and XP); and on my dual-booting systems I use Ubuntu more than XP.</p>
<p>Now having used both virtual and parallel booting systems, I think my inclination is for parallel ones.  Especially in the case of the ones on my Mac, the situation with conflicting shortcuts gets seriously confusing after a while.  Plus I like being able to take full advantage of the system resources rather than adding the extra bloat of running two operating systems at one time.  But that&#8217;s just me <img src='http://techticker.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Cheers,</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unique_stephen</title>
		<link>http://techticker.net/2008/05/08/ubuntu-live-2008/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>unique_stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mbogle.wordpress.com/?p=1610#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Well I now have ubuntu and windows running in parallels on the Macbook Pro</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I now have ubuntu and windows running in parallels on the Macbook Pro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
