<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shyftr: I&#8217;m not impressed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techticker.net/2008/04/13/shyftr-im-not-impressed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techticker.net/2008/04/13/shyftr-im-not-impressed/</link>
	<description>educational technology, eLearning &#38; emerging technology</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blogging 2.0 - It&#8217;s about communication, not content &#171; TechTicker</title>
		<link>http://techticker.net/2008/04/13/shyftr-im-not-impressed/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging 2.0 - It&#8217;s about communication, not content &#171; TechTicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 13:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mbogle.wordpress.com/?p=1552#comment-96</guid>
		<description>[...] The fear in including full feeds, Riley argued, was that blogs would be circumvented and readers would not ever visit the site to view the original content. Similarly, he continues, in the context of Blogging 1.0 vs. 2.0, the key threat perceived by bloggers when considering applications like FriendFeed is the loss of control. I have argued the same point myself many times, such as the post I wrote on Shyftr in April. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The fear in including full feeds, Riley argued, was that blogs would be circumvented and readers would not ever visit the site to view the original content. Similarly, he continues, in the context of Blogging 1.0 vs. 2.0, the key threat perceived by bloggers when considering applications like FriendFeed is the loss of control. I have argued the same point myself many times, such as the post I wrote on Shyftr in April. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Community Synthesised Content &#171; TechTicker</title>
		<link>http://techticker.net/2008/04/13/shyftr-im-not-impressed/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Community Synthesised Content &#171; TechTicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 13:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mbogle.wordpress.com/?p=1552#comment-95</guid>
		<description>[...] The fear in including full feeds, Riley argued, was that blogs would be circumvented and readers would not ever visit the site to view the original content. Similarly, Riley continues, in the context of Blogging 1.0 vs. 2.0, the key threat perceived by bloggers when considering applications like FriendFeed is the loss of control. I have argued the same point myself many times, such as the post I wrote on Shyftr in April. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The fear in including full feeds, Riley argued, was that blogs would be circumvented and readers would not ever visit the site to view the original content. Similarly, Riley continues, in the context of Blogging 1.0 vs. 2.0, the key threat perceived by bloggers when considering applications like FriendFeed is the loss of control. I have argued the same point myself many times, such as the post I wrote on Shyftr in April. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
